Winning the lottery is a dream of millions throughout the world, even those who never play! It seems silly that people who don’t play would dream of winning, but you know people like that, don’t you? One of the things that people who do play the lottery are looking for is the most picked winning lottery numbers, because they think that it will give them an advantage.
Well, it may give them an advantage, but perhaps not in the way they think. You see, there are subtle patterns that crop up if one analyzes the huge number of lottery drawings held by any organization. The problem is that few people are equipped to conduct a proper analysis of these patterns, so they can gain any sort of advantage from them.
The most picked winning numbers are not simply numbers that you can play each week and hop to repeat the success of previous drawings. There are very few instances where a set of six numbers has ever provided a repeat winner, so if that’s what you’re hoping for, you’re out of luck. No, you need to let go of that dream right now, and dig a bit deeper.
A thorough statistical analysis reveals that although the state and other lottery organizations claim that the lottery is a truly random drawing, that is not entirely the case. There is enough variation from true random to ensure that you can sometimes use trend analysis of the most picked winning numbers to your advantage.
For instance, if you take the Megamillions Lottery as an example, there are some things you can discover by looking at the frequency of winning numbers in past drawings. However, it is not just which numbers won that you need to look at. You also need to examine when they won, and the distribution of the winnings. If a specific number was part of the winning combination 6 times, but that happened in an 18 month period, 3 years ago, it probably does not apply now.
I’ll spare you the gritty details for those of you that never took a stats class, but rest assured the number distribution of Mega Millions is anything but random. In fact, one comprehensive statistical analysis revealed that between 1999 and 2007, there have been statistically significant abnormalities. For example, prior to 2002, the number 19 was drawn twenty one times, while the number 4 was pulled from the hopper 46 times! These two numbers are more than 2 standard deviations from the mean, which is the middle number of times all numbers were drawn. That turned out to be 34 times during the 8 year period of the analysis.
In 2002, the Mega Millions game changed from a 50 number pool to a 52 number pool. That had the effect of dramatically lessening your chances of winning. That makes the length of time between jackpots longer, and as a result the jackpots are larger, enticing even more people to play, despite the reduced odds of winning. A nice racket, don’t you think?
What can we determine by looking at the 52 number version of Mega Millions? Well, if you’re looking for trends, you can certainly spot them there. Again, there are significant variations from what could be expected if the number drawings were truly random. In the years from 2002 to 2005 , when the game was changed again, this time up to 56 numbers, there were a few numbers that appeared in frequencies either far above or below what could have been expected from a purely random drawing.
For example, the number 32 was drawn 45 times, and the number 10 was picked 44 times. On the other hand, the number 33 was picked only 20 times. Sound random to you? It isn’t purely random, as all 3 of these these numbers are more than 2 standard deviations from the mean number of times that they should be drawn during this time period, so there are certainly trends at work here.
A similar trend can be observed for the mega ball. Some are drawn far more or less than could be expected by pure, random chance if the game is entirely random. From 2002 to 2005 34 was chosen as the mega ball 14 times. On the other hand, the number 51 was only chosen a single time.
From the time the game changed to 56 possible numbers in 2005, until the analysis concluded in 2007, there were again trends apparent that one could observe. For example the number 47 appeared in only 10 drawings, while both 7 and 53 were selected 30 times. Again, all three of these numbers were more than 2 standard deviations from the mean.
What does this mean for you, even if you never play Mega Millions? It’s simple, really, whether you play mega Millions or any other state lottery game, you just can not trust that the games are purely random. That does however, offer you an advantage if you are positioned to take advantage of the phenomenon. If you can do a thorough analysis of the trends present in the drawings, you can possibly give yourself an edge over what you could achieve with no statistical insight.
The question is just how are you supposed to do that? After all statistical analysis at that level is none too easy even for the most astute minds, and discerning trends from the data is even more difficult. The answer naturally falls to computer software and the charts and graphs they can produce.
Face it, spotting trends among the thousands of lottery results is far from simple, even if you spend the hours it takes to gather up all the picked numbers from whatever games you play. Factor in actually getting the data into whatever formulas you may be using so you can get something that makes sense enough to help you pick winning numbers, and you’ll soon realize that good software or the formulas derived from them is the only answer.
If you are serious about taking advantage of the lottery trends, instead of them taking advantage of you, and finally winning a lottery jackpot, click here now to see some software that is well worth taking a look at.